Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
researchsquare; 2024.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-3995124.v1

ABSTRACT

This prospective cohort study aimed to estimate the natural, vaccine-induced, and hybrid immunity to SARS-CoV-2, alongside the immunogenicity of the mRNA-1273 booster after the BNT162b2 primary series in healthcare workers in Colombia. IgG, IgA, and neutralizing antibodies were measured in 110 individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection or a BNT162b2 primary series. Humoral responses and related factors were explored in a subgroup (n = 36) that received a BNT162b2 primary series followed by a mRNA-1273 booster (2BNT162b2 + 1mRNA-1273), and T-cell responses were evaluated in a subgroup of them (n = 16). For natural immunity, IgG and IgA peaked within three months, declining gradually but remaining detectable up to 283 days post-infection. Neutralizing antibody inhibition post-infection was below positive range (≥ 35%) but exceeded 97% in vaccine-induced and hybrid immunity groups. Following 2BNT162b2 + 1mRNA-1273, IgG peaked 3–4 months post-booster, gradually declining but remaining positive over 10 months, with IgA and neutralizing antibodies stable. Age and blood group were related to IgG response, while obesity and blood type to IgA response post-booster. Autoimmunity and blood type B were associated with lower neutralizing antibody inhibition. There were no differences in T-cell responses according to prior infection. These findings provide long-term insights into the immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and the immunogenicity of mRNA vaccines.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Obesity
2.
preprints.org; 2023.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-PREPRINTS.ORG | ID: ppzbmed-10.20944.preprints202305.0077.v1

ABSTRACT

In this review, we aimed to understand the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and preeclampsia severity in infected pregnant women. Pregnant women with SARS- CoV-2 infection have been shown to have a significantly increased risk of maternal death, ICU admission, preterm delivery, and stillbirth compared with those without infection. The risk of preeclampsia also increases in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2, particularly in those with severe symptoms. We emphasize the im-portance of specialized clinical management to prevent poor pregnancy outcomes in this situation. The association between COVID-19 and preeclampsia (PE) is likely due to multiple mechanisms, including the direct effects of the virus on trophoblast function and the arterial wall, acute atherosis, local inflammation leading to pla-cental ischemia, exaggerated inflammatory responses in pregnant women, SARS-CoV-2-related myocardial injury, cytokine storm, and thrombotic microan-giopathy. Emphasis has been placed on the potential impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women, specifically in relation to thrombotic complications, placental dysfunction, and cardiovascular dysfunction. Undoubtedly, one of the diagnostic tools to differentiate between COVID-19-induced preeclampsia-like syndrome and true preeclampsia is the use of biomarkers, such as the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio. We wish to highlight the potential for COVID-19-induced myocardial injury in pregnant women and the associated in-crease in maternal mortality rate. Vaccination against COVID-19 in the general population and in pregnant women in particular, drastically reduced the severity of the disease. There is an urgent need to continue the follow-up of these women and their children to detect the appearance of sequelae of the disease or peristent COVID 19


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Stillbirth , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , Death
3.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.04.26.22274264

ABSTRACT

A pregnant woman is 4 to 5 times more likely to suffer a thromboembolic event than a non-pregnant woman. Furthermore, an increase in these episodes has been observed in women infected with SARS-CoV-2. Consequently, the prophylactic prescription of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) in pregnant women is undergoing an increase that has not been evaluated yet. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of LMWH prescription in pregnant women at the Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (HUPHM), according to their level of risk and its variation due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. To answer this question, a retrospective cohort of 113 women who gave birth during the month of February at the HUPHM was designed. The level of individual risk of thromboembolism, according to the Royal College guidelines (37a), was calculated with an interview to complete a questionnaire and the analysis of their clinical records. 53.6% of the women were prescribed LMWH as indicated in the guidelines. This high prevalence is explained by the high age of the pregnant women (over 35 years), the wave of the omicron variant (December 2021) and a high rate of cesarean sections (25%). On the other hand, the percentage of patients with COVID-19 was 17.6% but only 53% of them had received LMWH. In conclusion, LMWH is a very common prescription in obstetrics, mostly during puerperium, and has become even more relevant due to the COVID-19 pandemic


Subject(s)
Thromboembolism , COVID-19
4.
Sensors (Basel) ; 21(20)2021 Oct 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1470954

ABSTRACT

The increasingly ageing population and the tendency to live alone have led science and engineering researchers to search for health care solutions. In the COVID 19 pandemic, the elderly have been seriously affected in addition to suffering from isolation and its associated and psychological consequences. This paper provides an overview of the RobWell (Robotic-based Well-Being Monitoring and Coaching System for the Elderly in their Daily Activities) system. It is a system focused on the field of artificial intelligence for mood prediction and coaching. This paper presents a general overview of the initially proposed system as well as the preliminary results related to the home automation subsystem, autonomous robot navigation and mood estimation through machine learning prior to the final system integration, which will be discussed in future works. The main goal is to improve their mental well-being during their daily household activities. The system is composed of ambient intelligence with intelligent sensors, actuators and a robotic platform that interacts with the user. A test smart home system was set up in which the sensors, actuators and robotic platform were integrated and tested. For artificial intelligence applied to mood prediction, we used machine learning to classify several physiological signals into different moods. In robotics, it was concluded that the ROS autonomous navigation stack and its autodocking algorithm were not reliable enough for this task, while the robot's autonomy was sufficient. Semantic navigation, artificial intelligence and computer vision alternatives are being sought.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mentoring , Robotics , Aged , Artificial Intelligence , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
5.
researchsquare; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-741045.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: Comorbidities increase the risk of death for patients with COVID-19, however, little is known about how comorbidities affect immigrants, as well as their prognosis in the case of contracting the virus. Therefore, this article aims to determine which comorbidities are associated with the probability of death among immigrants in Mexico. Methods We use a sample of migrants (N = 3,567) registered in the public database published in the National Epidemiological Surveillance System of the Mexican Ministry of Health; the technique used was a Probit regression. Results The results show that comorbidities commonly associated with death from COVID-19, are not significant when present in immigrants, also, migrants have fewer comorbidities than the native born. These findings could be explained by the Healthy Immigrant Effect, which states that migration is a self-selection process, in which those who migrate are the healthiest. However, the cases of migrants who have died from COVID-19 are related to the time they have taken to go to hospitals and to problems of access to health care.ConclusionsThe immigrant populations (especially those in transit and refugees) do pose certain challenges to public policies in the countries of destination, so specific measures need to be taken in order to protect immigrant communities from the spread of the virus. It is important to improve the conditions during the migratory journey, avoiding overcrowding, as well as testing in various places (shelters, immigration controls, among others) in order to determine the levels of positivity in this group. ​However, the detection of more cases of COVID-19 among immigrants, should not equal to the denial for entry. Formal mechanisms should be put into place to guarantee the right to asylum and non-refoulement, even for migrants who test positive for the virus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
6.
Applied Sciences ; 11(13):5877, 2021.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1302140

ABSTRACT

Formal modeling is considered one of the fundamental phases in the design of network algorithms, including Active Queue Management (AQM) schemes. This article focuses on modeling with Petri nets (PNs) a new scheme of AQM. This innovative AQM is based on a discrete dynamical model of random early detection (RED) for controlling bifurcations and chaos in Internet congestion control. It incorporates new parameters (α,β) that make possible better stability control over oscillations of an average queue length (AQL) at the router. The PN is validated through the matrix equation approach, reachability tree, and invariant analysis. The correctness is validated through the key properties of reachability, boundedness, reversibility, deadlock, and liveness.

7.
Revista Ibero-Americana De Estudos Em Educacao ; 16(2):424-439, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1200434

ABSTRACT

The This article aims to analyze university social responsibility in times of pandemic, viewed from the teaching role in promoting student self-care. For this, a quantitative approach and a non-experimental transectional-descriptive design were used. The participants were 85 teachers from the basic education pedagogy at the University of Antofagasta. Intentional probability sampling was applied and a Likert-type questionnaire was used. The results showed that teachers handle university social responsibility in times of pandemic, however, they need to strengthen the promotion of self-care in students and the management of knowledge about pandemic with powerful tools for care, protection and safeguarding of life. The findings found allowed to conclude that teachers should promote self-care promotion strategies, such as the use of podcasts, vodcasts, videos and educational capsules that access the understanding of the COVID-19 pandemic.

8.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.04.19.21255747

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT The link between coagulation system disorders and COVID-19 has not yet been fully elucidated. With the aim of evaluating the association of several coagulation proteins with COVID-19 severity and mortality, we performed a cross-sectional study in 134 patients classified according to the highest disease severity reached during the disease. We found higher levels of antithrombin, prothrombin, factor XI, factor XII and factor XIII in asymptomatic/mild and moderate COVID-19 patients than healthy individuals. Interestingly, decreased levels of antithrombin, factor XI, XII and XIII were observed in those patients who eventually developed severe illness. Additionally, survival models showed us that patients with lower levels of these coagulation proteins had an increased risk of death. In conclusion, COVID-19 provokes early increments of some specific coagulation proteins in most patients. However, lower levels of these proteins at diagnosis might “paradoxically” imply a higher risk of progression to severe disease and COVID-19-related mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
9.
researchsquare; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-434137.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: Information is lacking regarding long-term survival and predictive factors for mortality in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. We aimed to estimate 90-day and 180-day survival of patients with COVID-19 requiring invasive ventilation and to develop a predictive model for intensive care unit mortality.Methods: Retrospective, multicentre, national cohort study between March 8 and April 30, 2020 in 16 intensive care units (ICU) in Spain. Participants were consecutive adults who received invasive mechanical ventilation for COVID–19. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection detected in positive testing of a nasopharyngeal sample and confirmed by real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR). The primary outcomes were 90-day and 180-day survival after hospital admission. Secondary outcomes were length of ICU and hospital stay, and ICU and in-hospital mortality. A predictive model and a nomogram were developed to estimate the probability of ICU mortality. Results: 868 patients were included (median age, 64 years [interquartile range [IQR], 56-71 years]; 72% male). Severity at ICU admission, estimated by SAPS3, was 56 points [IQR 50-63]. Prior to intubation, 26% received some type of noninvasive respiratory support. The 90-day and 180-day survival rates were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI] 66%-72%) and 59% (95% CI 56%-62%) respectively. The predictive factors associated with ICU mortality were: age (odds ratio [OR] 1.049 [95% CI 1.032-1.066] per 1-year increase), SAPS3 (OR 1.025 [95% CI 1.008-1.041] per 1-point increase), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (OR 1.009 [95% CI 1.002-1.016]), a failed attempt of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation previous to orotracheal intubation(OR 2.131 [95% CI 1.279-3.550]), and use of selective digestive decontamination (OR 0.587 [95% CI 0.358-0.963]).Conclusion: The long-term survival of mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 reaches more than 50% and may help to provide individualized risk stratification and potential treatments.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04379258. Registered 10 April 2020 (retrospectively registered).


Subject(s)
COVID-19
10.
preprints.org; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-PREPRINTS.ORG | ID: ppzbmed-10.20944.preprints202012.0709.v1

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised questions about the possible cross immunity resulting from common vaccination programs and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore, the Spanish Obstetric Emergency group performed a multicenter prospective study on the vaccination status of Influenza and Tdap (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine boost administered in adulthood) in consecutive cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a pregnancy cohort, in order to assess its possible association with the clinical presentation and severity of symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as to determine the factors that may affect vaccination adherence. 1,150 SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women from 78 Spanish hospitals were analyzed: 183 had not received either vaccine, 23 had been vaccinated for Influenza only, 529 for Tdap only and 415 received both vaccines. No association was observed between the vaccination status and the clinical presentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or the severity of symptoms. However, a lower adherence to the administration of both vaccines was observed in the Latin-American subgroup. Based on the results above, we reinforce the importance of maternal vaccination programs in the actual pandemic. Health education campaigns should be specially targeted to groups less likely to participate in these programs, as well as for a future SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Tetanus
11.
Manon Vouga; Guillaume Favre; Oscar Martinez Perez; Leo Pomar; Laura Forcen Acebal; Alejandra Abascal; Maria Rosa Vila Hernandez; Najeh Hcini; Véronique Lambert; Gabriel Carles; Joanna Sichitiu; Laurent Salomon; Julien Stiremann; Yves Ville; Begoña Martinez de Tejada; Anna Goncé; Ameth Hawkins-Villareal; Karen Castillo; Eduard Gratacos Solsona; Lucas Trigo; Brian Cleary; Michael Geary; Helena Bartels; Feras Al-Kharouf; Fergal Malone; Mary Higgins; Niamh Keating; Susan Knowles; Christophe Poncelet; Carolina Carvalho; Fernanda Ribeiro-do-Valle; Garanhani Surita; Amanda Dantas-Silva; Carolina Borrelli; Adriana Gomes Luz; Javiera Fuenzalida; Jorge Carvajal; Manuel Guerra Canales; Olivia Hernandez; Olga Grechukhina; Albert Ko; Uma Reddy; Rita Figueiredo; Marina Moucho; Pedro Viana Pinto; Carmen De Luca; Marco De Santis; Diogo Ayres de Campos; Charles Garabedian; Damien Subtil; Betania Bohrer; Maria Lucia Da Rocha Oppermann; Maria Celeste; Osorio Wender; Lavinia Schuler-Faccini; Maria Teresa Vieira Sanseverino; Camila Giugliani; Luciana Friedrich; Mariana Horn Scherer; Nicolas Mottet; Guillaume Ducarme; Helene Pelerin; Chloe Moreau; Bénédicte Breton; Thibaud Quibel; Patrick Rozenberg; Doris Mueller; Cristina Granado; Irene Hoesli; Cécile Monod; Dirk Bassler; Sandra Heldstab; Nicole Ochsenbein Kölble; Loïc Sentilhes; Melissa Charvet; Jan Deprest; Jute Richter; Lennart Van der Veeken; Béatrice Eggel-Hort; Gaetan Plantefeve; Mohamed Derouich; Albaro José Nieto Calvache; Maria Camila Lopez-Giron; Juan Manuel Burgos-Luna; Maria Fernanda Escobar-Vidarte; Kurt Hecher; Ann-Christin Tallarek; Eran Hadar; Karina Krajden Haratz; Gustavo Malinger; Ron Maymon; Yariv Yogev; Leonhard Schäffer; Arnaud Toussaint; Marie-Claude Rossier; Renato Augusto Moreira de sa; Claudia Grawe; Karoline Aebi-Popp; Anda-Petronela Radan; Luigi Raio; Daniel Surbek; Paul Böckenhoff; Brigitte Strizek; Martin Kaufmann; Andrea Bloch; Michel Boulvain; Silke Johann; Sandra Andrea Heldstab; Monya Todesco Bernasconi; Gaston Grant; Anis Feki; Anne-Claude Muller Brochut; Marylene Giral; Lucie Sedille; Andrea Papadia; Romina Capoccia Brugger; Brigitte Weber; Tina Fischer; Christian Kahlert; Karin Nielsen Saines; Mary Cambou; Panagiotis Kanellos; Xiang Chen; Mingzhu Yin; Annina Haessig; David Baud; Alice Panchaud.
ssrn; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-SSRN | ID: ppzbmed-10.2139.ssrn.3724278

ABSTRACT

Background: Recent evidence suggests that pregnant women might be at higher risk of severe disease associated with the emerging pandemic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), while exposed fetuses/newborns could suffer from preterm birth, growth restriction and neonatal infections. The magnitude of this increased risk and specific risk factors for severity remains unclear.Methods: We performed a case control study comparing pregnant women with severe coronavirus disease 19 (case) to pregnant women with a milder form (controls) enrolled in COVI-Preg international registry cohort between from March 24 to July 26, 2020. Risk factors for severity, obstetrical, fetal and neonatal outcomes were assessed.Findings: A total of 926 pregnant women with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 were included, among which 92 (9.9%) presented a severe COVID-19 disease. Risk factors for severe maternal outcomes were pulmonary comorbidities [aOR 4.3, 95% CI 1.9-9.5], hypertensive disorders [aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.0-7.0] and diabetes [aOR2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.5]. Pregnant women with severe maternal outcomes were at higher risk of cesarean sections [70.7% (n=53/75)], preterm deliveries [62.7% (n= 32/51)] and newborns requiring admission to the neonatal intensive care unit [41.3% (n=31/75)].Interpretation: Pregnant women, particularly those with associated comorbidities, seem to be at higher risk of severe complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes appear to be influenced by the severity of maternal disease; complications include cesarean sections, prematurity and neonatal admission to the intensive care unit.Funding Statement: None.Declaration of Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.Ethics Approval Statement: The study was approved by both the Swiss Ethical Board (CER-VD- 2020-00548) and the local ethics boards at each participating center.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections , Diabetes Mellitus , Hypertension
12.
Manon Vouga; Guillaume Favre; Oscar Martinez Perez; Leo Pomar; Laura Forcen Acebal; Alejandra Abascal; Maria Rosa Vila Hernandez; Najeh Hcini; Véronique Lambert; Gabriel Carles; Joanna Sichitiu; Laurent Salomon; Julien Stiremann; Yves Ville; Begoña Martinez de Tejada; Anna Goncé; Ameth Hawkins-Villareal; Karen Castillo; Eduard Gratacos Solsona; Lucas Trigo; Brian Cleary; Michael Geary; Helena Bartels; Feras Al-Kharouf; Fergal Malone; Mary Higgins; Niamh Keating; Susan Knowles; Christophe Poncelet; Carolina Carvalho; Fernanda Ribeiro-do-Valle; Garanhani Surita; Amanda Dantas-Silva; Carolina Borrelli; Adriana Gomes Luz; Javiera Fuenzalida; Manuel Guerra Canales; Olivia Hernandez; Olga Grechukhina; Albert Ko; Uma Reddy; Rita Figueiredo; Marina Moucho; Pedro Viana Pinto; Carmen De Luca; Marco De Santis; Diogo Ayres de Campos; Charles Garabedian; Damien Subtil; Betania Bohrer; Maria Lucia Da Rocha Oppermann; Maria Celeste; Osorio Wender; Lavinia Schuler-Faccini; Maria Teresa Vieira Sanseverino; Camila Giugliani; Luciana Friedrich; Mariana Horn Scherer; Nicolas Mottet; Guillaume Ducarme; Helene Pelerin; Chloe Moreau; Bénédicte Breton; Thibaud Quibel; Patrick Rozenberg; Doris Mueller; Cristina Granado; Irene Hoesli; Cécile Monod; Dirk Bassler; Sandra Heldstab; Nicole Ochsenbein Kölble; Loïc Sentilhes; Melissa Charvet; Jan Deprest; Jute Richter; Lennart Van der Veeken; Béatrice Eggel-Hort; Gaetan Plantefeve; Mohamed Derouich; Albaro José Nieto Calvache; Maria Camila Lopez-Giron; Juan Manuel Burgos-Luna; Maria Fernanda Escobar-Vidarte; Kurt Hecher; Ann-Christin Tallarek; Eran Hadar; Karina Krajden Haratz; Gustavo Malinger; Ron Maymon; Yariv Yogev; Leonhard Schäffer; Arnaud Toussaint; Marie-Claude Rossier; Renato Augusto Moreira de sa; Claudia Grawe; Karoline Aebi-Popp; Anda-Petronela Radan; Luigi Raio; Daniel Surbek; Paul Böckenhoff; Brigitte Strizek; Martin Kaufmann; Andrea Bloch; Michel Boulvain; Silke Johann; Monya Todesco Bernasconi; Gaston Grant; Anis Feki; Anne-Claude Muller Brochut; Marylene Giral; Lucie Sedille; Andrea Papadia; Romina Capoccia Brugger; Brigitte Weber; Tina Fischer; Christian Kahlert; Karin Nielsen Saines; Mary Cambou; Panagiotis Kanellos; Xiang Chen; Mingzhu Yin; Annina Haessig; David Baud; Alice Panchaud.
ssrn; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-SSRN | ID: ppzbmed-10.2139.ssrn.3684424

ABSTRACT

Background: Pregnant women represent a vulnerable population at higher risk of complications of infectious diseases. Data regarding the consequences of the emerging pandemic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during pregnancy are scarce. Recent evidence suggests that pregnant women might be at higher risk of severe disease, while exposed fetuses and newborns could suffer from preterm birth, growth restriction and neonatal infections.Methods: We developed an international web registry to allow structured data collection. Pregnant women at any stage during gestation tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled. Maternal, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were recorded.Findings: 1033 pregnant women tested for SARS-CoV-2 were included, among which 926 tested positive and 107 tested negative. Positive pregnant women were at higher risk of severe maternal outcomes compared to negative women [aRR 5.6, 95% CI 1.4-22.7]. Risk factors for severe maternal outcomes among positive women were pulmonary comorbidities [aOR 4.3, 95% CI 1.9-9.5], hypertensive disorders [aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.0-7.0] and diabetes [aOR2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.5]. No difference in term of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes were observed between positive and negative women. Positive pregnant women with severe maternal outcomes were at higher risk of cesarean sections [70.7% (n=53/75)], preterm deliveries [62.7% (n= 32/51)] and newborns requiring admission to the neonatal intensive care unit [41.3% (n=31/75)]. A positive neonatal SARS-CoV-2 test was observed in 2.9% (n=11/384) of newborns with an available test at birth.Interpretation: Pregnant women, particularly those with associated comorbidities, seem to be at higher risk of severe complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Preliminary data regarding obstetrical and neonatal outcomes among women with a mild disease are reassuring.Funding Statement: None.Declaration of Interests: The authors declare that we have no conflicts of interest.Ethics Approval Statement: The study was approved by both the Swiss Ethical Board (CER-VD-2020-00548) and the local ethics boards at each participating center.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Diabetes Mellitus , Communicable Diseases , Hypertension , COVID-19
13.
medrxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.09.05.20188458

ABSTRACT

Structured abstract Objective: To determine whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV 2, the cause of COVID 19 disease) exposure in pregnancy, compared to non exposure, is associated with infection related obstetric morbidity. Design and setting: Throughout Spain, 45 hospitals took part in the universal screening of pregnant women going into labour using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for COVID 19 since late March 2020. Methods: The cohort of exposed and unexposed pregnancies was followed up until 6 weeks postpartum. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusting for known confounding variables, determined the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of the association of COVID 19 exposure, compared to non exposure, with infection related obstetric outcomes. Main outcome measures: Preterm delivery (primary), premature rupture of membranes and neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Results: In the cohort of 1,009 screened pregnancies, 246 were COVID 19 positive. Compared to non exposure, COVID 19 exposure increased the odds of preterm birth (34 vs 51, 13.8% vs 6.7%, aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.32 3.36, p=0.002), premature rupture of membranes at term (39 vs 75, % vs 9.8%, aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.11 2.57, p=0.013) and neonatal intensive care unit admissions (23 vs 18, 9.3% vs 2.4%, aOR 4.62, 95% CI 2.43 8.94, p<0.001). Conclusion: This first prospective cohort study demonstrated that pregnant women infected with SARS CoV 2 have more infection related obstetric morbidity. This hypothesis merits evaluation of a causal association in further research.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL